Thursday, April 17, 2014
Vacation Reading
Over the vacation, finish reading and annotating Lanier's You Are Not a Gadget. You do not have a writing assignment with this reading. On Tuesday, April 29, the first class after the vacation, we will develop essay topics for this book.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Assgnment for Thursday, April 17
Read and annotate to p. 147 in Lanier's You Are Not a Gadget. Also, write at least one typed page defining or explaining the ideal relationship between people and digital technology. Be sure to take Lanier's arguments into consideration as you develop your position.
Monday, April 14, 2014
Assignment for Tuesday, April 15
Read and annotate up to p. 137 of Lanier's You Are Not a Gadget. You do not have a writing assignment.
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
Assignment for Thursday, April 3
Read and annotate to p. 44 in Jaron Lanier's You Are Not a Gadget. Pay particular attention to how he tries to persuade the reader of his point of view.
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Assignments for Monday, March 24, and Wednesday, March 26
For Monday, finish reading and annotating Press's Beautiful Souls (ch. 4 and the epilogue). There is no writing assignment.
On Wednesday, you will write an in-class essay on Beautiful Souls.
On Wednesday, you will write an in-class essay on Beautiful Souls.
Monday, March 17, 2014
Assignment for Wednesday, March 19
In Press's Beautiful Souls, read and annotate Chapter 3, "The Rules of Conscience," pp. 85-129. You have no writing assignment.
Sunday, March 16, 2014
For Monday, March 17
Read and annotate chapter 2 of Eyal Press's Beautiful Souls. Write one or two well-developed paragraphs in response to each of the following question: Press writes, "[W]hat ultimately determines moral conduct are not character traits, personal beliefs, or political attitudes but situational factors ... 'Studies designed to test whether people behave differently in ways that might reflect their having different character traits have failed to find relevant differences,' the philosopher Gilbert Harman has argued. 'It may even be the case that there is no such thing as character.'" (29) Do you agree with this position? What do you think determined moral conduct?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)